Hall Of Fame Or Superbowl Ring

[Saintsfan1972]

You are a NFL rookie. When your career is over and it's all said and done....you can only have one....which would you prefer, Super Bowl Ring or a bust in the Hall of Fame?

[Saintsfan1972]

i say the ring....you never hear players saying they regret that they didn't get into the HOF......you play to win the game!!!!!

[mj1987us26]

HoF to me. People remember those in the hall but there are sooooo many superbowl winners who are forgotten by most.

[86WARD]

The ultimate goal (for most players) is a Super Bowl Ring. But then again, a Hall of Fame career is something else.

Basically, you are asking if I want to be Dan Marino or Trent Dilfer and I would have to say Dan Marino...

[bigsexyy81]

HoF.

There are a shitload of guys every year who get a ring who really had nothing to do with that team winning. If you're in the Hall, you were an elite player among your peers.

[Chipper10]

I think I'd have to agree with Hall. You've had a great career, successful for a long period of time.

Having a ring, what does that really prove? The back ups get rings, too. Doesn't mean they actually EARNED it on the field.

[SeanTaylor21]

Pretty much what Ward said I would much rather be the HoF even if I didn't have a SB ring.

[Buck Fenson]

I would say Super Bowl. True, everyone gets a ring when they win but it is a team game. If I am a rookie my goal would be to win a Super Bowl. Others have to put you in the Hall. A Super Bowl ring is something I would have a say in.

[Steve12]

I wonder of Marino would trade his busy for a ring. Surely someone has asked him that question before right?

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S2 Skyrocket

[86WARD]

I'm pretty sure he would...

Here's a couple different opinions:

For Bruschi, choice between Super Bowl ring and HOF is a “no-brainer” | ProFootballTalk

To my example...lol...Trent Dilfer said he'd rather be Dan Marino than have a Super Bowl ring...

Trent Dilfer: 6/26 - ESPN New York