Follow Us:

[86WARD]

I said it when the "review rule" was created. It was a bogus rule because it only covered half of the story. You can't have a rule in place that only covers half of the plays...it's silly to say the least.

At the very least, this play should've been reviewed...regardless.

[CStevenson13]

Originally Posted by 86WARD

I said it when the "review rule" was created. It was a bogus rule because it only covered half of the story. You can't have a rule in place that only covers half of the plays...it's silly to say the least.

At the very least, this play should've been reviewed...regardless.

Agree completely, i havent watched a replay of the catch nor do i care to, when it was live i didnt believe it was a catch but it shoulda have at least been reviewed.

[Inclulbus]

I never thought it should of been reviewed. But even after rewatching it, he never even got two feet down.

[Steve12]

The rule should allow for it to be reviewed. But as it stands now, it shouldn't have been reviewed. Hopefully they amend the rule in the offseason.

[YEAH DUDE!]

Didn't this happen in a Lions game? I think titus Young came down with two feet down and the ref said it was incomplete but the Lions were out of Challenges and they wouldn't review the TD because the ref said it was incomplete? Is this kinda the same thing? I hate the fucking refs.